With so many Republicans apparently committed to voting against a military strike against Syria, the Obama Administration will be forced to rely on Democrats, including liberals, to win the vote in Congress. From an ideological perspective it looks odd, but members of Congress lining up to support the president of their party - or against the president of the other party - on military action is nothing new.
In 1999, President Bill Clinton asked Congress for authorization to conduct military air operations and missile strikes in Kosovo. The resolution passed the Senate 58-41, with 72 percent of the "yes" votes coming from Democrats. The resolution failed in the House (213-213), but 85 percent of the 213 "yes" votes came from Democrats.
1999 Kosovo Resolution (S.Con.Res 21)
|Vote Position||House (4/28/1999)||Senate (3/23/1999)|
|Voted Yes||213 [181 D (85%), 31 R (15%)]||58 [42 D (72%), 16 R (28%)]|
|Voted No||213 [26 D (12%), 187 R (88%)]||41 [3 D (7%), 38 R (93%)]|
|Did Not Vote||8 [4 D, 4 R]||1 [1 R]|
In 2002, when Republican George W. Bush was president, the Iraq War Resolution passed the Senate, 77-23. Two-thirds (62 percent) of the votes in favor came from Republicans. In the House, 73 percent of the support (215 of 296 “yes” votes), came from Republicans.
2002 Iraq Resolution (H.J. Res. 114)
|Vote Position||House (10/10/2002)||Senate (10/11/2002)|
|Voted Yes||296 [81 D (27%), 215 R (73%)]||77 [29 D (38%), 48 R (62%)]|
|Voted No||133 [126 D (95%), 6 R (5%), 1 I]||23 [21 D (91%), 1 R (4%), 1 I]|
|Did Not Vote||3 [1 D, 2 R]||0|
To be sure, Kosovo and Iraq were two very different military operations taking place at two very different times. However, while there were some defections on both sides, most members of Congress stood with their party. The big difference is that in 1999 and 2002 the potential military action, as well as the approval ratings of the two presidents, was more popular than either President Obama or action in Syria is today.
Presidential Job Approval At Time of War Resolution
Public Opinion of Military Operation Before Before Vote in Congress
|Military Operation||% Approve||% Disapprove|
|Kosovo (3/19-21/99): Gallup**||46%||43%|
|Iraq (10/3-6/02): Gallup**||53%||40%|
|Syria (8/28-9/1/13) ABC/WaPo**||36%||59%|
It’s a lot easier to stick with your “team” when the leader of your squad – and what he’s asking you to vote for – is popular rather than unpopular.Web Editor Loren Fulton contributed to this article
** Full question:
"If a peace agreement is not reached between the Yugoslavian Serbs and Kosovo's ethnic Albanian majority, NATO has said it would carry out air and missile attacks against Serb military installations. Would you favor or oppose the U.S. being a part of that military action?"
March 19-21, 1999
"Would you favor or oppose invading Iraq with U.S. ground troops in an attempt to remove Saddam Hussein from power?"
Oct. 3-6, 2002
"The United States says it has determined that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons in the civil war there. Given this, do you support or oppose the United States launching missile strikes against the Syrian government?"
August 28-September 1, 2013
- August 16, 2013The Incumbent Conundrum: Getting People To Vote For You When They Hate Washington
- August 21, 2013There'll Be A Democratic Primary. With Or Without Hillary
- September 4, 2013August Town Halls Tell Us Nothing
Charlie Cook's Column
Uphill BattlesDecember 6, 2013
The 2014 elections are now 11 months away, but the political scene has already undergone dramatic changes just in the past three months. Republicans went into a political free fall after the government shutdown, and shortly thereafter Democrats plunged into boiling water thanks to the botched launch of and early public reaction to the Affordable Care Act. This column has cautioned against...Read more »
More Columns »
Sign up for Charlie’s columns as they are released on NationalJournal.com »
The Rhodes Cook Letter
This latest issue of "The Rhodes Cook Letter" takes a look at voter turnout, which has been high of late in presidential elections - at least high by U.S. standards. There is also a look at the unfolding special elections, with a particular emphasis on...Download »