Hil­lary Clin­ton is fa­cing a myri­ad of chal­lenges in her bid to be­come pres­id­ent, but los­ing the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion to Bernie Sanders is not one. Iron­ic­ally while Clin­ton was widely con­sidered to be far to the left of her hus­band’s Ad­min­is­tra­tion, she is now fa­cing a party that has moved strongly to her left. Sanders is cap­tur­ing the ima­gin­a­tion and pas­sions of not just the left but young­er, more ideal­ist­ic voters. He is the new, shiny ob­ject (though six years older than Clin­ton), prom­ising an ideal­ist­ic world with no col­lege tu­ition and Medi­care for all. Good luck try­ing to ex­plain to his fans that Sanders’s pro­pos­als are totally un­real­ist­ic and fin­an­cially un­ten­able. But hav­ing said all of that, and no mat­ter what happened in Iowa and New Hamp­shire, Sanders is not go­ing to be the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee. He fought Clin­ton to a vir­tu­al tie Iowa and will likely do com­par­ably well in most of the oth­er 14 caucus states. The caucus pro­cess in­her­ently fa­vors strongly ideo­lo­gic­al can­did­ates be­cause they have the most pas­sion­ate sup­port­ers. After all, few nor­mal people both­er

More from the Cook Political Report